NCLA Discusses Harrow v. Department of Defense SCOTUS Decision

Administrative Static Podcast

Sisällön tarjoaa 1360 KHNC and Administrative Static. 1360 KHNC and Administrative Static tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.

8M ago 12:30

MP3•Jakson koti

Fetch error

Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now. Last successful fetch was on August 13, 2024 17:49 (5M ago)

What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.

The Supreme Court recently issued its opinion in Harrow v. Department of Defense. In this case, the Court reviewed a judgment from the Federal Circuit, which originally stemmed from a decision by the Merit Systems Protection Board. The Federal Circuit had held that the 60-day statutory deadline for Harrow to file his petition for review was a “jurisdictional requirement” and thus “precludes equitable exceptions.”

In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Kagan, the Supreme Court vacated and remanded the Federal Circuit's judgment. The Court held that the 60-day deadline is not a jurisdictional requirement and therefore does not preclude equitable exceptions.

In this episode, Mark and Jenin discuss how this decision could affect Metal Conversion Technologies, LLC v. United States Department of Transportation, a case for which the NCLA has filed a cert petition.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

105 jaksoa

#News #Government #1360 KHNC #Administrative Static