Artwork

Sisällön tarjoaa Eric Beasley. Eric Beasley tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.
Player FM - Podcast-sovellus
Siirry offline-tilaan Player FM avulla!

Speculation Station 189

Jaa
 

Manage series 3550428
Sisällön tarjoaa Eric Beasley. Eric Beasley tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.
Reach out to Eric and Ben via the comments section or by sending a message to speculationstationmail@gmail.com. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Over Eight Billion people alive today have never listened to this podcast. Be the change you want to see in the world. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ In this podcast, Eric Beasley and Ben Conte strive to offer rare perspectives, arguments, classifications, advice on social, psychological, philosophical concepts. We want to give air to some alternative viewpoints and nuances that usually stay hidden due to confirmation bias, the structure of the knowledge creation industry, relative monetization prospects, etc. Often there are several existing ”acceptable” arguments/opinions one may have on an issue. You may espouse a stance that abortion be legal, safe, and rare OR that terminating a pregnancy with a viable fetus is murder (and different shades of these arguments), but are there more views that don’t fit so-nicely in that dichotomous landscape? How does modern technology (or will future technological progress) affect the different lines-in-the-sand where we tend to assemble? Should we spend more time, thought, design on realizing just how incomplete each of our view of reality is (if there even is such a static concept as objective reality)? What do we do with the knowledge that humans, and especially modern humans are merely a rounding error compared to the deep-time of Earth’s existence and the longer time during which our universe is thought to have been present? ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Here’s an example the types of ideas we’d explore on a given topic: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CRIMINAL JUSTICE, TECHNOLOGY, MORALITY: Should we punish people for societally transgressive behavior? What happens when we can detect what exactly in their brain and situation caused this trouble? Can we blame someone when anyone of us with the same brains in the same situation would have done the same? If not, how should ideas of crime and punishment play-out? What goals do people have with the criminal justice system? At what point of certainty that some individual is going to commit a crime, should we step in (and how forcefully) to stop that crime? Do we do similar proactive acts in other fields (like for example, putting a one-loss Alabama team in the College Football Playoff over an undefeated Florida State team onthe basis that Alabama will be much more competitive in the playoff).How might we re-imagine criminal justice? Can ”criminal justice” even really exist in literal terms? ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ On the pod, we will also explore things like: *How does everyone’s perception of everything vary and why do we possibly tend to ignore or downplay this? *Are single-people (non-married) discirminated against in modern society and should our definition (legally and otherwise) of marriage be so strict? *Who stole the cookie from the cookie jar? *Are there any truly objective categories in the world, or are they all constructs created by humans to thrive, dominate others, create order from chaos, etc. *Why so many people feel that their particular career could never be replaced by AI. *How does our enjoyment of music reflect a social process? What music would we like if you were never in society? *How closely does the map match the terrain? *Is putting your money in the stock market early and often in order to get that sweet compound interest later in life really a no-brainer? *Why do we, and should we, pay such disproportionate attention (and attribute causality and responsibility) to the end of things: the exact time left on the clock at the end of professional sports games, the last card in a poker round, the last lotto number, the last choice right before something good or something bad happens, etc. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ We’ll also have fun parody commercials. What’s not to love? (this is rhetorical) ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Please send any comments, requests, vitriol, rants, etc. to speculationstationmail@gmail.com
  continue reading

2 jakso

Artwork

Speculation Station 189

updated

iconJaa
 
Manage series 3550428
Sisällön tarjoaa Eric Beasley. Eric Beasley tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.
Reach out to Eric and Ben via the comments section or by sending a message to speculationstationmail@gmail.com. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Over Eight Billion people alive today have never listened to this podcast. Be the change you want to see in the world. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ In this podcast, Eric Beasley and Ben Conte strive to offer rare perspectives, arguments, classifications, advice on social, psychological, philosophical concepts. We want to give air to some alternative viewpoints and nuances that usually stay hidden due to confirmation bias, the structure of the knowledge creation industry, relative monetization prospects, etc. Often there are several existing ”acceptable” arguments/opinions one may have on an issue. You may espouse a stance that abortion be legal, safe, and rare OR that terminating a pregnancy with a viable fetus is murder (and different shades of these arguments), but are there more views that don’t fit so-nicely in that dichotomous landscape? How does modern technology (or will future technological progress) affect the different lines-in-the-sand where we tend to assemble? Should we spend more time, thought, design on realizing just how incomplete each of our view of reality is (if there even is such a static concept as objective reality)? What do we do with the knowledge that humans, and especially modern humans are merely a rounding error compared to the deep-time of Earth’s existence and the longer time during which our universe is thought to have been present? ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Here’s an example the types of ideas we’d explore on a given topic: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CRIMINAL JUSTICE, TECHNOLOGY, MORALITY: Should we punish people for societally transgressive behavior? What happens when we can detect what exactly in their brain and situation caused this trouble? Can we blame someone when anyone of us with the same brains in the same situation would have done the same? If not, how should ideas of crime and punishment play-out? What goals do people have with the criminal justice system? At what point of certainty that some individual is going to commit a crime, should we step in (and how forcefully) to stop that crime? Do we do similar proactive acts in other fields (like for example, putting a one-loss Alabama team in the College Football Playoff over an undefeated Florida State team onthe basis that Alabama will be much more competitive in the playoff).How might we re-imagine criminal justice? Can ”criminal justice” even really exist in literal terms? ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ On the pod, we will also explore things like: *How does everyone’s perception of everything vary and why do we possibly tend to ignore or downplay this? *Are single-people (non-married) discirminated against in modern society and should our definition (legally and otherwise) of marriage be so strict? *Who stole the cookie from the cookie jar? *Are there any truly objective categories in the world, or are they all constructs created by humans to thrive, dominate others, create order from chaos, etc. *Why so many people feel that their particular career could never be replaced by AI. *How does our enjoyment of music reflect a social process? What music would we like if you were never in society? *How closely does the map match the terrain? *Is putting your money in the stock market early and often in order to get that sweet compound interest later in life really a no-brainer? *Why do we, and should we, pay such disproportionate attention (and attribute causality and responsibility) to the end of things: the exact time left on the clock at the end of professional sports games, the last card in a poker round, the last lotto number, the last choice right before something good or something bad happens, etc. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ We’ll also have fun parody commercials. What’s not to love? (this is rhetorical) ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Please send any comments, requests, vitriol, rants, etc. to speculationstationmail@gmail.com
  continue reading

2 jakso

Усі епізоди

×
 
Loading …

Tervetuloa Player FM:n!

Player FM skannaa verkkoa löytääkseen korkealaatuisia podcasteja, joista voit nauttia juuri nyt. Se on paras podcast-sovellus ja toimii Androidilla, iPhonela, ja verkossa. Rekisteröidy sykronoidaksesi tilaukset laitteiden välillä.

 

Pikakäyttöopas