))
Algorithm Integrity Matters: for Financial Services leaders, to enhance fairness and accuracy in data processing
«
»
Article 19. Algorithmic System Reviews: Substantive vs. Controls Testing
Fetch error
Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now.
Last successful fetch was on October 30, 2025 20:37 (
What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.
Manage episode 462005823 series 3594717
Sisällön tarjoaa Risk Insights: Yusuf Moolla. Risk Insights: Yusuf Moolla tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.
Spoken by a human version of this article.
- Knowing the basics of substantive testing vs. controls testing can help you determine if the review will meet your needs.
- Substantive testing directly identifies errors or unfairness, while controls testing evaluates governance effectiveness. The results/conclusions are different.
- Understanding these differences can also help you anticipate the extent of your team's involvement during the review process.
Links
This article details a (largely) substantive testing method for accuracy reviews.
About this podcast
A podcast for Financial Services leaders, where we discuss fairness and accuracy in the use of data, algorithms, and AI.
Hosted by Yusuf Moolla.
Produced by Risk Insights (riskinsights.com.au).
27 jaksoa
Jaa
