))
Algorithm Integrity Matters: for Financial Services leaders, to enhance fairness and accuracy in data processing
«
»
Article 16. Algorithmic System Accuracy Reviews – Choosing the Right Approach
Fetch error
Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now.
Last successful fetch was on October 30, 2025 20:37 (
What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.
Manage episode 453207773 series 3594717
Sisällön tarjoaa Risk Insights: Yusuf Moolla. Risk Insights: Yusuf Moolla tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.
Spoken (by a human) version of this article.
- Outcome-focused accuracy reviews directly verify results, offering more robust assurance than process-focused methods.
- This approach can catch translation errors, unintended consequences, and edge cases that process reviews might miss.
- While more time-consuming and complex, outcome-focused reviews provide deeper insights into system reliability and accuracy.
This article explains why verifying outcomes is preferred over tracing through processes, and how it works.
About this podcast
A podcast for Financial Services leaders, where we discuss fairness and accuracy in the use of data, algorithms, and AI.
Hosted by Yusuf Moolla.
Produced by Risk Insights (riskinsights.com.au).
27 jaksoa
Jaa
