))
Episode 10: The questionable ethics behind forced smoke inhalation research
Manage episode 387728387 series 2935422
Sisällön tarjoaa rachel smith and Rachel smith. rachel smith and Rachel smith tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.
For several years, Animal-Free Science Advocacy has been closely monitoring the use of forced inhalation studies in Australian Institutions.
This led to the development of our report: "Optimising Inhalation Research: Transitioning to Human-relevant Science."
In this episode, we learn from Animal-Free Science Advocacy CEO Rachel Smith about the questionable ethics that surround the use of animals in smoke inhalation studies. These obsolete tests continue to be used in some Australian universities and research institutes.
There are safe, precise and animal-free methods that can be used instead of these tests.
Read our report: Optimising Inhalation Research: Transitioning to Human-relevant Science
Learn more about our Forced to Smoke campaign.
Connect with HRA in the following ways:
Website: https://www.humaneresearch.org.au/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HumaneResearchAustralia
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/humaneresearch/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/hraust?lang=en
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/humane-research-australia
17 jaksoa
Jaa
