))
A pre-conviction criminal restitution lien doesn't violate the automatic stay
Manage episode 313806152 series 3288514
Sisällön tarjoaa Michael Rice. Michael Rice tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.
In today’s (first!) episode, I walk you through a recent case in which an Arizona bankruptcy court ruled that a creditor doesn’t violate the automatic stay when a creditor pursues a pre-petition criminal restitution lien. In re Nash, 19-bk-11174 (Judge Ballinger, October 21, 2021).
In the episode I mentioned the Gruntz case in the Ninth Circuit which can be found at 202 F.3d 1074 (9th Cir. 2000).
You can find the Nash opinion on my blog at https://michaelricelaw.com.
Please reach out to me! I’m actively looking for new bankruptcy clients, especially challenging cases, adversaries, or contested matters. While I’m only licensed in California and can only give legal advice to California clients, I’d love to hear your story or know if I can help some other way.
Attorney advertising. My practice qualifies as a debt relief agency because I help people file for bankruptcy under federal law--among other things!
565 Pier Avenue, #1481, Hermosa Beach, California 90254
7 jaksoa
Jaa
