Keeping It On Track: The Conservative Case for Choosing Rails Over Air
Manage episode 380080808 series 3509059
Zach highlights the limitations of our current system, noting, "There's no long-distance travel competition, except for driving, which takes a long time and is expensive based on gas." Airlines almost enjoy a monopoly on long-distance travel, partly because the U.S. has historically underinvested in its rail infrastructure. Zach expands, “Most of the long-distance trains share track with freight, and the freight is prioritized." This leads to frequent delays and an unreliable passenger train network.
As Hannah pointed out, the lack of competition means Americans often face frustrations when traveling: "But in a world where we have railroads and we can just ride the train, and these seats are so much larger and we're comfortable and have more leg room, I don't have to worry about someone snuggling up to me who I don't know." The conversation circles to the heart of the matter: Why hasn't the U.S. invested more in rail infrastructure? Zach mentions, "We transitioned to a car-centric economy in the 1950s... Rail just fell on the wayside, and people stopped using it."
An intriguing aspect that Hannah brings up is the heavy subsidization of the airline industry. She says, "Another really big reason why airlines dominate is because the government subsidizes the airline industry heavily." This, combined with America's car-centric approach, has created an environment where there's a significant barrier to efficient, sustainable, and affordable travel.
But beyond travel efficiency, the conversation dives deeper into the societal implications. Hannah touches on how modern infrastructure design affects social interactions: "Suburbia and the urban sprawl... Makes it hard for me to meet new people and make friends because I'm not sitting next to someone on the train. I'm not walking down to a local library to go study." The sprawling, disconnected design of many American cities discourages community engagement and interactions, leading to a more isolated society.
In contrasting the travel experience, Zach emphasizes the comforts of train travel: "They're not charging you for every little item you're bringing on... And you know what the best part is? They're connected into the city. They're integrated into the city. So you get into the city and you can walk around. And they also have legroom, which is really important."
In conclusion, the episode is a wake-up call. While planes might get us to our destination faster, the overall convenience, safety, and benefits of train travel, especially high-speed rail, can't be ignored. As Zach sums it up, "Safer, more luxurious. I'm going to be in Spain in, uh, next month. My high-speed rail ticket was only half the price compared to what it would have been to fly."
The future of American travel might very well lie on tracks, not in the skies. The conversation that Zach and Hannah initiated is an essential one, not only for the future of transportation but for the way we envision our cities, communities, and connections with each other.
Action Steps
- Contact your member of congress to say you are a constituent who supports rail projects.
- Click here to contact your House Representative
- Click here to contact your Senator
- Join: Citizens Climate Lobby Conservatives
- Listen: EcoRight Speaks Podcast, a project of RebulicEN
Contact Us
email: info @ greenteapartyradio.com
website: https://www.greenteapartyradio.com/
55 jaksoa