Artwork

Sisällön tarjoaa Reverie. Reverie tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.
Player FM - Podcast-sovellus
Siirry offline-tilaan Player FM avulla!

The Osmosis Bridging Proposals, featuring Sunny Aggarwal (Osmosis) and Sergey Gorbunov (Axelar)

57:49
 
Jaa
 

Manage episode 327395566 series 3007314
Sisällön tarjoaa Reverie. Reverie tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.

This week, we chat about Osmosis' unique approach to bridge selection. Unlike other projects which have used many bridges, Osmosis underwent a "canonical bridge selection" process to choose one provider, with the intention of providing a superior UX for end users. All of this was done through on-chain governance. Axelar emerged victorious, and is working on an integration with Osmosis.

In this podcast, we talk about the unique governance process used, the various bridge providers involved, and Axelar's unique approach. Additionally, we talk about Cosmos-based governance systems broadly, and how it differs from those built on Ethereum.

---

Resources:

---

Twitter: @sunnya97 | @sergey_nog |@lsukernik | @derek_hsue

----

Show Notes:

  • How Cosmos-based governance systems compare to Ethereum-based systems
  • The role of validators as hybrid service providers, investors and infrastructure builders
  • Why Osmosis decided to pick one bridge provider to start, as opposed to many
  • The unique design behind the bridge selection proposals
  • Axelar's unique bridging approach to the bridge selection process
  • Why founders should build their own AppChains
  • The broader benefits of modular governance systems

  continue reading

55 jaksoa

Artwork
iconJaa
 
Manage episode 327395566 series 3007314
Sisällön tarjoaa Reverie. Reverie tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.

This week, we chat about Osmosis' unique approach to bridge selection. Unlike other projects which have used many bridges, Osmosis underwent a "canonical bridge selection" process to choose one provider, with the intention of providing a superior UX for end users. All of this was done through on-chain governance. Axelar emerged victorious, and is working on an integration with Osmosis.

In this podcast, we talk about the unique governance process used, the various bridge providers involved, and Axelar's unique approach. Additionally, we talk about Cosmos-based governance systems broadly, and how it differs from those built on Ethereum.

---

Resources:

---

Twitter: @sunnya97 | @sergey_nog |@lsukernik | @derek_hsue

----

Show Notes:

  • How Cosmos-based governance systems compare to Ethereum-based systems
  • The role of validators as hybrid service providers, investors and infrastructure builders
  • Why Osmosis decided to pick one bridge provider to start, as opposed to many
  • The unique design behind the bridge selection proposals
  • Axelar's unique bridging approach to the bridge selection process
  • Why founders should build their own AppChains
  • The broader benefits of modular governance systems

  continue reading

55 jaksoa

Alle episoder

×
 
Loading …

Tervetuloa Player FM:n!

Player FM skannaa verkkoa löytääkseen korkealaatuisia podcasteja, joista voit nauttia juuri nyt. Se on paras podcast-sovellus ja toimii Androidilla, iPhonela, ja verkossa. Rekisteröidy sykronoidaksesi tilaukset laitteiden välillä.

 

Pikakäyttöopas