))
Episode 23 - Common Carrier Doctrine, Supreme Court Terms, and Embezzling to Buy Pokemon Cards
Manage episode 430791776 series 3588770
Sisällön tarjoaa Lex Rex Institute. Lex Rex Institute tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.
In this episode, we review the 5th Circuit's decision on the Texas House Bill 20, which imposes restrictions on social media companies, and discuss why plans to set term lengths (and not "term limits" - we are nothing if not pedantic) for Supreme Court justices is a very counterproductive idea.
After that, we return yet again to Captain Kangaroo Court to discuss the purchasing habits of attorneys who embezzle funds. It may surprise you to learn that they do not always make the most sensible of financial decisions.
All this, plus how to instantly prove your superior knowledge to anyone who says people in the olden days didn't live as long!
Texas social media law (4:05)
Plans to impose terms on the Supreme Court (27:50)
Captain Kangaroo Court (38:10)
Note: the chart we referenced with the lengths of Supreme Court tenures couldn't be uploaded as art for this episode, but please check out our website or our Facebook page for the image.
Link to the episode where we discuss the Florida social media law: https://rss.com/podcasts/lexrexpod/505303/
41 jaksoa
Jaa
