Artwork

Sisällön tarjoaa Utrecht Young Academy and Open Science Community Utrecht. Utrecht Young Academy and Open Science Community Utrecht tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.
Player FM - Podcast-sovellus
Siirry offline-tilaan Player FM avulla!

The Road to Open Science, Ep. 1, A Social Dilemma

41:30
 
Jaa
 

Manage episode 207192417 series 1816787
Sisällön tarjoaa Utrecht Young Academy and Open Science Community Utrecht. Utrecht Young Academy and Open Science Community Utrecht tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.
Episode 1: A social dilemma The Road to Open Science podcast series follows the path to open science through the perspective of researchers. What is open science and what can it do for research? In this first episode, ‘A social dilemma’, we try to answer the first part of this question and will also look into the current contradiction between the goals of the academic system and those of the individual scientist. Sascha Friesike, our first guest, describes this situation as a social dilemma. Sascha is assistant professor Digital Innovation at VU Amsterdam and one of the editors and writers of the book Opening Science, on the significant impact of internet on research, collaboration and publishing practices. He has done extensive research on adapting open science practices. In this podcast he will tell us more about the various definitions and the barriers to a wider embrace of open science. He describes the current situation as a social dilemma: ‘Individual rationality leads to collective irrationality.’ Our second guest is Frank Miedema, professor of immunology, dean and vice chairman of the board at the University Medical Center in Utrecht. He is also one of the initiators of Science in Transition. Miedema generally confirms the issues that are raised by Friesike: he expresses that ‘The purpose of the individual is not in sync anymore with the purpose of the system.’ In his opinion, the management of universities and major funding agencies are responsible in the first instance to change the current situation and they must add to their efforts to improve the incentives and reward system. What are your opinions on the issues that are raised in this first episode? Please feel welcome to engage in the discussion on twitter (https://twitter.com/R2OSpodcast) or on the portal of the Open Science Community Utrecht (https://openscience-utrecht.com/r2os-episode-1/) where you can also find all the show notes.
  continue reading

48 jaksoa

Artwork
iconJaa
 
Manage episode 207192417 series 1816787
Sisällön tarjoaa Utrecht Young Academy and Open Science Community Utrecht. Utrecht Young Academy and Open Science Community Utrecht tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.
Episode 1: A social dilemma The Road to Open Science podcast series follows the path to open science through the perspective of researchers. What is open science and what can it do for research? In this first episode, ‘A social dilemma’, we try to answer the first part of this question and will also look into the current contradiction between the goals of the academic system and those of the individual scientist. Sascha Friesike, our first guest, describes this situation as a social dilemma. Sascha is assistant professor Digital Innovation at VU Amsterdam and one of the editors and writers of the book Opening Science, on the significant impact of internet on research, collaboration and publishing practices. He has done extensive research on adapting open science practices. In this podcast he will tell us more about the various definitions and the barriers to a wider embrace of open science. He describes the current situation as a social dilemma: ‘Individual rationality leads to collective irrationality.’ Our second guest is Frank Miedema, professor of immunology, dean and vice chairman of the board at the University Medical Center in Utrecht. He is also one of the initiators of Science in Transition. Miedema generally confirms the issues that are raised by Friesike: he expresses that ‘The purpose of the individual is not in sync anymore with the purpose of the system.’ In his opinion, the management of universities and major funding agencies are responsible in the first instance to change the current situation and they must add to their efforts to improve the incentives and reward system. What are your opinions on the issues that are raised in this first episode? Please feel welcome to engage in the discussion on twitter (https://twitter.com/R2OSpodcast) or on the portal of the Open Science Community Utrecht (https://openscience-utrecht.com/r2os-episode-1/) where you can also find all the show notes.
  continue reading

48 jaksoa

Kaikki jaksot

×
 
Loading …

Tervetuloa Player FM:n!

Player FM skannaa verkkoa löytääkseen korkealaatuisia podcasteja, joista voit nauttia juuri nyt. Se on paras podcast-sovellus ja toimii Androidilla, iPhonela, ja verkossa. Rekisteröidy sykronoidaksesi tilaukset laitteiden välillä.

 

Pikakäyttöopas