Artwork

Sisällön tarjoaa Klasko Immigration, Klasko Immigration Law Partners, and LLP. Klasko Immigration, Klasko Immigration Law Partners, and LLP tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.
Player FM - Podcast-sovellus
Siirry offline-tilaan Player FM avulla!

Episode 30: EB-5 Litigation Victory!

20:52
 
Jaa
 

Manage episode 340402821 series 2105959
Sisällön tarjoaa Klasko Immigration, Klasko Immigration Law Partners, and LLP. Klasko Immigration, Klasko Immigration Law Partners, and LLP tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.

Ron Klasko and Dan Lundy, both partners with Klasko Immigration Law Partners, talk with Anu Nair about a major litigation victory on which they were co-counsel. The litigation is significant because USCIS had put restrictions on the EB-5 regional center program that went beyond what Congress intended when it reinstated the program in March 2022, which would have killed the program for years.

Anu Nair asks Ron Klasko and Dan Lundy to explain the importance and the details of the settlement and what it means for regional centers and investors moving forward:

  1. Why was the litigation necessary to reopen the program?
  2. What are the terms of the litigation settlement?
  3. Are all the regional centers active again?
  4. What is the difference between the forms I-956 and the I-956F?
  5. What documents can investors use now to file their petitions?
  6. What is the likelihood of issues with regional center recertification?
  7. Will there be any deference given to previously approved regional centers and projects?
  8. What happens to investors if their regional centers don’t continue in the program?
  9. What more communication will the EB-5 industry have with USCIS in the future?

Thank you to our clients, who were plaintiffs in this litigation: EB-5 Capital, CanAm Enterprises, Civitas Capital Group, Golden Gate Global, Pine State Regional Center, and IIUSA. Without their intervention, the EB-5 regional center program would still be inactive today.

Please email us at podcast@klaskolaw.com with any questions you have on this topic.

Speakers on this episode are:

Stay connected with us:

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

  continue reading

43 jaksoa

Artwork
iconJaa
 
Manage episode 340402821 series 2105959
Sisällön tarjoaa Klasko Immigration, Klasko Immigration Law Partners, and LLP. Klasko Immigration, Klasko Immigration Law Partners, and LLP tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.

Ron Klasko and Dan Lundy, both partners with Klasko Immigration Law Partners, talk with Anu Nair about a major litigation victory on which they were co-counsel. The litigation is significant because USCIS had put restrictions on the EB-5 regional center program that went beyond what Congress intended when it reinstated the program in March 2022, which would have killed the program for years.

Anu Nair asks Ron Klasko and Dan Lundy to explain the importance and the details of the settlement and what it means for regional centers and investors moving forward:

  1. Why was the litigation necessary to reopen the program?
  2. What are the terms of the litigation settlement?
  3. Are all the regional centers active again?
  4. What is the difference between the forms I-956 and the I-956F?
  5. What documents can investors use now to file their petitions?
  6. What is the likelihood of issues with regional center recertification?
  7. Will there be any deference given to previously approved regional centers and projects?
  8. What happens to investors if their regional centers don’t continue in the program?
  9. What more communication will the EB-5 industry have with USCIS in the future?

Thank you to our clients, who were plaintiffs in this litigation: EB-5 Capital, CanAm Enterprises, Civitas Capital Group, Golden Gate Global, Pine State Regional Center, and IIUSA. Without their intervention, the EB-5 regional center program would still be inactive today.

Please email us at podcast@klaskolaw.com with any questions you have on this topic.

Speakers on this episode are:

Stay connected with us:

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

  continue reading

43 jaksoa

Kaikki jaksot

×
 
Loading …

Tervetuloa Player FM:n!

Player FM skannaa verkkoa löytääkseen korkealaatuisia podcasteja, joista voit nauttia juuri nyt. Se on paras podcast-sovellus ja toimii Androidilla, iPhonela, ja verkossa. Rekisteröidy sykronoidaksesi tilaukset laitteiden välillä.

 

Pikakäyttöopas