E.M.D. Sales v. Carrera, No. 23-217 [Arg: 11.5.2024]

Supreme Court of the United States

Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right

32 subscribers

Lisätty five vuotta sitten

Sisällön tarjoaa Better Informed Network. Better Informed Network tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.

Species Unite

1
Andrianna Natsoulas: Don't Cage Our Oceans 40:50

8 päivää sitten40:50

Toista Myöhemmin

Listat

Tykkää

Tykätty

40:50

“That's taxpayer’s money that is going to support research and development and pilot projects to develop a food system that is based on environmental destruction and greed and disregard for animals, fish, and any of the other marine mammals that might be around it.” - Andrianna Natsoulas Andrianna Natsoulas is the campaign director for Don't Cage Our Oceans, an organization that exists to keep our oceans free from industrial fish farms. Offshore finfish farming is the mass cultivation of finfish in marine waters, in underwater or floating net pens, pods, and cages. Offshore finfish farms are factory farms that harm public health, the environment, and local communities and economies that rely on the ocean and its resources. Don’t Cage Our Oceans are a coalition of diverse organizations working together to stop the development of offshore finfish farming in the United States through federal law, policies, and coalition building. And, although it is not yet happening, right now the US Administration and Congress are promoting this kind of farming, which would be nothing short of disastrous for the oceans, the planet and the people and animals who live here. dontcageouroceans.org…

vuosi sitten 42:10

MP3•Jakson koti

QUESTION PRESENTED:

Whether the burden of proof that employers must satisfy to demonstrate the applicability of a Fair Labor Standards Act exemption is a mere preponderance of the evidence or clear and convincing evidence.

★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

341 jaksoa

#Politics #News #Austin Songer #Government #Justice #Supreme Court #USA #United States #Docket

Supreme Court of the United States

E.M.D. Sales v. Carrera, No. 23-217 [Arg: 11.5.2024]

Supreme Court of the United States

32 subscribers

published vuosi sitten

Jaa

MP3•Jakson koti

QUESTION PRESENTED:

Whether the burden of proof that employers must satisfy to demonstrate the applicability of a Fair Labor Standards Act exemption is a mere preponderance of the evidence or clear and convincing evidence.

★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

341 jaksoa

#Politics #News #Austin Songer #Government #Justice #Supreme Court #USA #United States #Docket

Tất cả các tập

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Cunningham v. Cornell University, No. 23-1007 [Arg: 1.22.2025] 1:30:44

5 weeks sitten1:30:44

1:30:44

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a plaintiff can state a claim by alleging that a plan fiduciary engaged in a transaction constituting a furnishing of goods, services, or facilities between the plan and a party in interest, as proscribed by 29 U.S.C. § 1106(a)(1)(C) , or whether a plaintiff must plead and prove additional elements and facts not contained in the provision’s text. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Barnes v. Felix, No. 23-1239 [Arg: 1.22.2025] 1:15:57

5 weeks sitten1:15:57

1:15:57

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether courts should apply the "moment of the threat" doctrine when evaluating an excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson Corporation, No. 23-1226 [Arg: 1.21.2025] 1:13:53

5 weeks sitten1:13:53

1:13:53

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the Federal Communications Commission’s legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Food and Drug Administration v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co., No. 23-1187 [Arg: 1.21.2025] 1:12:12

5 weeks sitten1:12:12

1:12:12

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a manufacturer may file a petition for review in a circuit (other than the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit) where it neither resides nor has its principal place of business, if the petition is joined by a seller of the manufacturer’s products that is located within that circuit. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, No. 23-1122 [Arg: 1.15.2025] 2:05:32

5 weeks sitten2:05:32

2:05:32

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the court of appeals erred as a matter of law in applying rational-basis review, instead of strict scrutiny, to a law burdening adults’ access to protected speech. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, No. 23-971 [Arg: 1.14.2025] 49:01

7 weeks sitten49:01

49:01

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 is a “final judgment, order, or proceeding” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Thompson v. U.S., No. 23-1095 [Arg: 1.14.2025] 1:17:03

7 weeks sitten1:17:03

1:17:03

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether 18 U.S.C. § 1014 , which prohibits making a “false statement” for the purpose of influencing certain financial institutions and federal agencies, also prohibits making a statement that is misleading but not false. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida, No. 23-997 [Arg: 1.13.2025] 1:18:04

7 weeks sitten1:18:04

1:18:04

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, under the Americans with Disabilities Act , a former employee — who was qualified to perform her job and who earned post-employment benefits while employed — loses her right to sue over discrimination with respect to those benefits solely because she no longer holds her job. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Hewitt v. U.S., No. 23-1002 [Arg: 1.13.2025] 1:30:43

7 weeks sitten1:30:43

1:30:43

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the First Step Act ’s sentencing reduction provisions apply to a defendant originally sentenced before the act’s enactment, when that original sentence is judicially vacated and the defendant is resentenced to a new term of imprisonment after the act’s enactment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

Supreme Court of the United States

1
TikTok v. Garland, No. 24-656 [Arg: 1.10.2025] 2:28:50

8 weeks sitten2:28:50

2:28:50

QUESTION PRESENTED: - Whether the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act , as applied to petitioners, violates the First Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers, No. 23-900 [Arg: 12.11.2024] 1:10:58

11 weeks sitten1:10:58

1:10:58

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether an award of the “defendant’s profits” under the Lanham Act can include an order for the defendant to disgorge the distinct profits of legally separate non-party corporate affiliates. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado, No. 23-975 [Arg: 12.10.2024] 1:50:37

11 weeks sitten1:50:37

1:50:37

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the National Environmental Policy Act requires an agency to study environmental impacts beyond the proximate effects of the action over which the agency has regulatory authority. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Feliciano v. Department of Transportation, No. 23-861 [Arg: 12.9.2024] 1:13:34

11 weeks sitten1:13:34

1:13:34

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is not directly connected to the national emergency. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Kousisis v. U.S., No. 23-909 [Arg: 12.9.2024] 1:26:52

11 weeks sitten1:26:52

1:26:52

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether deception to induce a commercial exchange can constitute mail or wire fraud, even if inflicting economic harm on the alleged victim was not the object of the scheme; whether a sovereign’s statutory, regulatory, or policy interest is a property interest when compliance is a material term of payment for goods or services; and whether all contract rights are “property.” ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

Supreme Court of the United States

1
U.S. v. Skrmetti, No. 23-477 [Arg: 12.4.2024] 2:21:11

12 weeks sitten2:21:11

2:21:11

QUESTION PRESENTED: - Whether Tennessee Senate Bill 1 , which prohibits all medical treatments intended to allow “a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor’s sex” or to treat “purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor’s sex and asserted identity,” violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

Tervetuloa Player FM:n!

Player FM skannaa verkkoa löytääkseen korkealaatuisia podcasteja, joista voit nauttia juuri nyt. Se on paras podcast-sovellus ja toimii Androidilla, iPhonela, ja verkossa. Rekisteröidy sykronoidaksesi tilaukset laitteiden välillä.