Artwork

Sisällön tarjoaa Ethan Sawyer. Ethan Sawyer tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.
Player FM - Podcast-sovellus
Siirry offline-tilaan Player FM avulla!

413: Intellectual Curiosity + College Admissions: What It Is, Why It Matters to Colleges, and How to Show It

47:54
 
Jaa
 

Manage episode 390579219 series 2807443
Sisällön tarjoaa Ethan Sawyer. Ethan Sawyer tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.

In today’s episode, Tom Campbell (CEG’s Community Manager) and Susan Tree (a college counseling and admissions legend with 40+ years of experience) chat about “intellectual curiosity”: a quality that many colleges actively look for in students, yet is a little more ambiguous and nuanced compared to mapping out a high school course plan.

This is part 2 of a series about students’ academic background and interests and how they factor into the admissions process. Part 1 is about all things related to the academic part of a student’s college application— which, at many selective colleges, is seen as the “foot in the door” of their selection process.

On the episode you’ll hear Susan and Tom discuss:

  • Identifying an academic superpower and framing it in that way in your college application
  • How coming across as "too complete" to colleges (as in, you have no bigger questions you'd like to solve) can actually make your application less competitive
  • How to infuse intellectual curiosity into your supplemental essays
  • Showing academic and nonacademic alignment for particularly popular majors

Hope you enjoy.

Play-by-Play

  • 1:38 - Reframing your accomplishments as superpowers
  • 7:12 - Identifying your learning style among Architects, Gardeners, and Explorers
  • 10:22 - Why colleges want different types of learners
  • 13:52 - Why communicating what you’re curious about to admissions officers is a good idea
  • 15:07 - Staying in touch with who you are on your application
  • 19:17 - Understanding the pressure to present a complete version of yourself
  • 22:55 - An example of showing intellectual curiosity through supplemental essays
  • 26:44 - The value of curiosity in non-academic spaces
  • 32:52 - How highly-selective colleges evaluate quality vs. quantity in their applicants
  • 38:51 - What is academic alignment vs. non-academic alignment? How does this impact the way colleges read applications?
  • 43:34 - What if your high school doesn’t offer specialized programs to help you explore your intellectual curiosity?
  • 46:49 - Final thoughts

Resources

  continue reading

76 jaksoa

Artwork
iconJaa
 
Manage episode 390579219 series 2807443
Sisällön tarjoaa Ethan Sawyer. Ethan Sawyer tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.

In today’s episode, Tom Campbell (CEG’s Community Manager) and Susan Tree (a college counseling and admissions legend with 40+ years of experience) chat about “intellectual curiosity”: a quality that many colleges actively look for in students, yet is a little more ambiguous and nuanced compared to mapping out a high school course plan.

This is part 2 of a series about students’ academic background and interests and how they factor into the admissions process. Part 1 is about all things related to the academic part of a student’s college application— which, at many selective colleges, is seen as the “foot in the door” of their selection process.

On the episode you’ll hear Susan and Tom discuss:

  • Identifying an academic superpower and framing it in that way in your college application
  • How coming across as "too complete" to colleges (as in, you have no bigger questions you'd like to solve) can actually make your application less competitive
  • How to infuse intellectual curiosity into your supplemental essays
  • Showing academic and nonacademic alignment for particularly popular majors

Hope you enjoy.

Play-by-Play

  • 1:38 - Reframing your accomplishments as superpowers
  • 7:12 - Identifying your learning style among Architects, Gardeners, and Explorers
  • 10:22 - Why colleges want different types of learners
  • 13:52 - Why communicating what you’re curious about to admissions officers is a good idea
  • 15:07 - Staying in touch with who you are on your application
  • 19:17 - Understanding the pressure to present a complete version of yourself
  • 22:55 - An example of showing intellectual curiosity through supplemental essays
  • 26:44 - The value of curiosity in non-academic spaces
  • 32:52 - How highly-selective colleges evaluate quality vs. quantity in their applicants
  • 38:51 - What is academic alignment vs. non-academic alignment? How does this impact the way colleges read applications?
  • 43:34 - What if your high school doesn’t offer specialized programs to help you explore your intellectual curiosity?
  • 46:49 - Final thoughts

Resources

  continue reading

76 jaksoa

Kaikki jaksot

×
 
Loading …

Tervetuloa Player FM:n!

Player FM skannaa verkkoa löytääkseen korkealaatuisia podcasteja, joista voit nauttia juuri nyt. Se on paras podcast-sovellus ja toimii Androidilla, iPhonela, ja verkossa. Rekisteröidy sykronoidaksesi tilaukset laitteiden välillä.

 

Pikakäyttöopas