Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right
32 subscribers
Checked 1M ago
Lisätty five vuotta sitten
Sisällön tarjoaa Better Informed Network. Better Informed Network tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.
Player FM - Podcast-sovellus
Siirry offline-tilaan Player FM avulla!
Siirry offline-tilaan Player FM avulla!
Kuuntelemisen arvoisia podcasteja
SPONSOROITU
T
TechSurge: Deep Tech VC Podcast


1 Understanding the Elegant Math Behind Modern Machine Learning 1:14:43
1:14:43
Toista Myöhemmin
Toista Myöhemmin
Listat
Tykkää
Tykätty1:14:43
Artificial intelligence is evolving at an unprecedented pace—what does that mean for the future of technology, venture capital, business, and even our understanding of ourselves? Award-winning journalist and writer Anil Ananthaswamy joins us for our latest episode to discuss his latest book Why Machines Learn: The Elegant Math Behind Modern AI . Anil helps us explore the journey and many breakthroughs that have propelled machine learning from simple perceptrons to the sophisticated algorithms shaping today’s AI revolution, powering GPT and other models. The discussion aims to demystify some of the underlying math that powers modern machine learning to help everyone grasp this technology impacting our lives, even if your last math class was in high school. Anil walks us through the power of scaling laws, the shift from training to inference optimization, and the debate among AI’s pioneers about the road to AGI—should we be concerned, or are we still missing key pieces of the puzzle? The conversation also delves into AI’s philosophical implications—could understanding how machines learn help us better understand ourselves? And what challenges remain before AI systems can truly operate with agency? If you enjoy this episode, please subscribe and leave us a review on your favorite podcast platform. Sign up for our newsletter at techsurgepodcast.com for exclusive insights and updates on upcoming TechSurge Live Summits. Links: Read Why Machines Learn, Anil’s latest book on the math behind AI https://www.amazon.com/Why-Machines-Learn-Elegant-Behind/dp/0593185749 Learn more about Anil Ananthaswamy’s work and writing https://anilananthaswamy.com/ Watch Anil Ananthaswamy’s TED Talk on AI and intelligence https://www.ted.com/speakers/anil_ananthaswamy Discover the MIT Knight Science Journalism Fellowship that shaped Anil’s AI research https://ksj.mit.edu/ Understand the Perceptron, the foundation of neural networks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perceptron Read about the Perceptron Convergence Theorem and its significance https://www.nature.com/articles/323533a0…
Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Becerra, No. 23-715 [Arg: 11.5.2024]
Manage episode 450821261 series 2558408
Sisällön tarjoaa Better Informed Network. Better Informed Network tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.
QUESTION PRESENTED:
- Whether the phrase “entitled ... to benefits,” used twice in the same sentence of the Medicare Act, means the same thing for Medicare part A and Supplemental Social Security benefits, such that it includes all who meet basic program eligibility criteria, whether or not benefits are actually received.
341 jaksoa
Manage episode 450821261 series 2558408
Sisällön tarjoaa Better Informed Network. Better Informed Network tai sen podcast-alustan kumppani lataa ja toimittaa kaiken podcast-sisällön, mukaan lukien jaksot, grafiikat ja podcast-kuvaukset. Jos uskot jonkun käyttävän tekijänoikeudella suojattua teostasi ilman lupaasi, voit seurata tässä https://fi.player.fm/legal kuvattua prosessia.
QUESTION PRESENTED:
- Whether the phrase “entitled ... to benefits,” used twice in the same sentence of the Medicare Act, means the same thing for Medicare part A and Supplemental Social Security benefits, such that it includes all who meet basic program eligibility criteria, whether or not benefits are actually received.
341 jaksoa
Tất cả các tập
×
1 Cunningham v. Cornell University, No. 23-1007 [Arg: 1.22.2025] 1:30:44
1:30:44
Toista Myöhemmin
Toista Myöhemmin
Listat
Tykkää
Tykätty1:30:44
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a plaintiff can state a claim by alleging that a plan fiduciary engaged in a transaction constituting a furnishing of goods, services, or facilities between the plan and a party in interest, as proscribed by 29 U.S.C. § 1106(a)(1)(C) , or whether a plaintiff must plead and prove additional elements and facts not contained in the provision’s text. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

1 Barnes v. Felix, No. 23-1239 [Arg: 1.22.2025] 1:15:57
1:15:57
Toista Myöhemmin
Toista Myöhemmin
Listat
Tykkää
Tykätty1:15:57
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether courts should apply the "moment of the threat" doctrine when evaluating an excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

1 McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson Corporation, No. 23-1226 [Arg: 1.21.2025] 1:13:53
1:13:53
Toista Myöhemmin
Toista Myöhemmin
Listat
Tykkää
Tykätty1:13:53
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the Federal Communications Commission’s legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

1 Food and Drug Administration v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co., No. 23-1187 [Arg: 1.21.2025] 1:12:12
1:12:12
Toista Myöhemmin
Toista Myöhemmin
Listat
Tykkää
Tykätty1:12:12
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a manufacturer may file a petition for review in a circuit (other than the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit) where it neither resides nor has its principal place of business, if the petition is joined by a seller of the manufacturer’s products that is located within that circuit. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

1 Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, No. 23-1122 [Arg: 1.15.2025] 2:05:32
2:05:32
Toista Myöhemmin
Toista Myöhemmin
Listat
Tykkää
Tykätty2:05:32
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the court of appeals erred as a matter of law in applying rational-basis review, instead of strict scrutiny, to a law burdening adults’ access to protected speech. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 is a “final judgment, order, or proceeding” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

1 Thompson v. U.S., No. 23-1095 [Arg: 1.14.2025] 1:17:03
1:17:03
Toista Myöhemmin
Toista Myöhemmin
Listat
Tykkää
Tykätty1:17:03
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether 18 U.S.C. § 1014 , which prohibits making a “false statement” for the purpose of influencing certain financial institutions and federal agencies, also prohibits making a statement that is misleading but not false. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

1 Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida, No. 23-997 [Arg: 1.13.2025] 1:18:04
1:18:04
Toista Myöhemmin
Toista Myöhemmin
Listat
Tykkää
Tykätty1:18:04
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, under the Americans with Disabilities Act , a former employee — who was qualified to perform her job and who earned post-employment benefits while employed — loses her right to sue over discrimination with respect to those benefits solely because she no longer holds her job. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

1 Hewitt v. U.S., No. 23-1002 [Arg: 1.13.2025] 1:30:43
1:30:43
Toista Myöhemmin
Toista Myöhemmin
Listat
Tykkää
Tykätty1:30:43
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the First Step Act ’s sentencing reduction provisions apply to a defendant originally sentenced before the act’s enactment, when that original sentence is judicially vacated and the defendant is resentenced to a new term of imprisonment after the act’s enactment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

1 TikTok v. Garland, No. 24-656 [Arg: 1.10.2025] 2:28:50
2:28:50
Toista Myöhemmin
Toista Myöhemmin
Listat
Tykkää
Tykätty2:28:50
QUESTION PRESENTED: - Whether the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act , as applied to petitioners, violates the First Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

1 Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers, No. 23-900 [Arg: 12.11.2024] 1:10:58
1:10:58
Toista Myöhemmin
Toista Myöhemmin
Listat
Tykkää
Tykätty1:10:58
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether an award of the “defendant’s profits” under the Lanham Act can include an order for the defendant to disgorge the distinct profits of legally separate non-party corporate affiliates. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

1 Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado, No. 23-975 [Arg: 12.10.2024] 1:50:37
1:50:37
Toista Myöhemmin
Toista Myöhemmin
Listat
Tykkää
Tykätty1:50:37
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the National Environmental Policy Act requires an agency to study environmental impacts beyond the proximate effects of the action over which the agency has regulatory authority. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

1 Feliciano v. Department of Transportation, No. 23-861 [Arg: 12.9.2024] 1:13:34
1:13:34
Toista Myöhemmin
Toista Myöhemmin
Listat
Tykkää
Tykätty1:13:34
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is not directly connected to the national emergency. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

1 Kousisis v. U.S., No. 23-909 [Arg: 12.9.2024] 1:26:52
1:26:52
Toista Myöhemmin
Toista Myöhemmin
Listat
Tykkää
Tykätty1:26:52
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether deception to induce a commercial exchange can constitute mail or wire fraud, even if inflicting economic harm on the alleged victim was not the object of the scheme; whether a sovereign’s statutory, regulatory, or policy interest is a property interest when compliance is a material term of payment for goods or services; and whether all contract rights are “property.” ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

1 U.S. v. Skrmetti, No. 23-477 [Arg: 12.4.2024] 2:21:11
2:21:11
Toista Myöhemmin
Toista Myöhemmin
Listat
Tykkää
Tykätty2:21:11
QUESTION PRESENTED: - Whether Tennessee Senate Bill 1 , which prohibits all medical treatments intended to allow “a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor’s sex” or to treat “purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor’s sex and asserted identity,” violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
Tervetuloa Player FM:n!
Player FM skannaa verkkoa löytääkseen korkealaatuisia podcasteja, joista voit nauttia juuri nyt. Se on paras podcast-sovellus ja toimii Androidilla, iPhonela, ja verkossa. Rekisteröidy sykronoidaksesi tilaukset laitteiden välillä.